NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• 1317.6x more texture fill rate: 124.8 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
• 4.3x more pipelines: 3328 vs 768
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 2.4x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 5 GB
• Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1110 vs 630
• Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13725 vs 6957
• 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 72896 vs 22896
• Around 97% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5815 vs 2958
• Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 207.704 vs 113.416
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3385.355 vs 1414.794
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 22.913 vs 6.736
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 240.964 vs 81.206
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1030.098 vs 417.823

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000

• Around 91% higher core clock speed: 1076 MHz vs 562 MHz
• Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• 4.7x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2000

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1110 630
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	13725 6957
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	72896 22896
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	5815 2958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	207.704 113.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3385.355 1414.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.913 6.736
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	240.964 81.206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1030.098 417.823

Compare specifications (specs)