NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile 12GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile 12GB and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile 12GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 34% higher boost clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1075 MHz
- 959.9x more texture fill rate: 184.3 GTexel/s vs 192 billion / sec
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3072
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 250x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13843 vs 12748
- Around 97% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 81157 vs 41155
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 Mar 2022 vs 17 March 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 1075 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 184.3 GTexel/s vs 192 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 3072 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13843 vs 12748 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 81157 vs 41155 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 855 MHz
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 828 vs 596
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 855 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 828 vs 596 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile 12GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile 12GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 596 | 828 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13843 | 12748 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 81157 | 41155 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.231 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1722.566 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.245 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.225 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 518.554 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9834 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3700 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9834 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3700 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1231 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile 12GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GA104 | GM200 |
Launch date | 22 Mar 2022 | 17 March 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 119 | 332 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Price now | $1,999.99 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.38 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1440 MHz | 1075 MHz |
Core clock speed | 855 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 184.3 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.80 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 11.80 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4096 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 92.16 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 184.3 GTexel/s | 192 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 8,000 million |
CUDA cores | 3072 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,691 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin + 8-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
SLI options | 4x | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 336.0 GB/s | 336.5 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost |