NVIDIA RTX A4500 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A4500 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 75% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 64% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 Nov 2021 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1056 vs 1055 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1650 MHz
- Around 50% higher texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 369.6 GTexel/s
- Around 46% higher pipelines: 10496 vs 7168
- Around 20% higher maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 20 GB
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26700 vs 21530
- Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 191364 vs 142286
- Around 56% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19886 vs 12768
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz vs 1650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s vs 369.6 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 10496 vs 7168 |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 20 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26700 vs 21530 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 191364 vs 142286 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19886 vs 12768 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A4500 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1056 | 1055 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21530 | 26700 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 142286 | 191364 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 12768 | 19886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 711.408 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5528.565 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 62.812 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 228.496 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2431.277 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Code name | GA102 | GA102 |
Launch date | 23 Nov 2021 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 42 | 44 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1499 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1695 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 739.2 GFLOPS (1:32) | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 23.65 TFLOPS (1:1) | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 23.65 TFLOPS | 35.58 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 7168 | 10496 |
Pixel fill rate | 158.4 GPixel/s | 189.8 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 369.6 GTexel/s | 556.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 28300 million | 28300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 313 mm (12.3 inches) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 750 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | Triple-slot |
Height | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 20 GB | 24 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 640.0 GB/s | 936.2 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 320 bit | 384 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |