NVIDIA T1000 8 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T1000 8 GB and NVIDIA Quadro K4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T1000 8 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 1065 MHz vs 810 MHz
- 1506.9x more texture fill rate: 78.12 GTexel/s vs 51.84 GTexel / s
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 896 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 80 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 3 GB
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 876 vs 424
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7654 vs 2721
- 5.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38055 vs 6674
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 May 2021 vs 1 March 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1065 MHz vs 810 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 78.12 GTexel/s vs 51.84 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 3 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 876 vs 424 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7654 vs 2721 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38055 vs 6674 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000
- 4.5x more memory clock speed: 5616 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
Memory clock speed | 5616 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T1000 8 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA T1000 8 GB | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 876 | 424 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7654 | 2721 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38055 | 6674 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.462 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 427.88 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.899 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.742 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 61.965 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3798 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3321 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3798 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3321 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 817 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA T1000 8 GB | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
Code name | TU117 | GK106 |
Launch date | 6 May 2021 | 1 March 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 140 | 866 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,269 | |
Price now | $225.65 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.81 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1395 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1065 MHz | 810 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 78.12 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.000 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.500 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 896 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 44.64 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 78.12 GTexel/s | 51.84 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 2,540 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,244 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 134.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | 5616 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |