NVIDIA T1000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T1000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T1000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 1065 MHz vs 924 MHz
- Around 34% higher boost clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- 940.8x more texture fill rate: 78.12 GTexel/s vs 83.04 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 62% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 81 Watt
- Around 98% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 37634 vs 19001
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 6 May 2021 vs 7 October 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1065 MHz vs 924 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 78.12 GTexel/s vs 83.04 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 81 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 37634 vs 19001 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
- Around 43% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 896
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 896 |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA T1000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 37634 | 19001 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5691 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 378 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 59.428 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1113.788 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.157 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.101 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 81.909 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8546 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8546 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 472 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA T1000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | TU117 | GM204 |
| Launch date | 6 May 2021 | 7 October 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 566 | 568 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,560.89 | |
| Price now | $1,899 | |
| Type | Laptop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 3.99 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1065 MHz | 924 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 78.12 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.000 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.500 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 896 | 1280 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.64 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 78.12 GTexel/s | 83.04 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 81 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 5,200 million |
| CUDA cores | 1280 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,657 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Single-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 1 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 120 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | 2500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||

