NVIDIA Tesla K80 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K80 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 300 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 3% higher memory clock speed: 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 562 MHz
- 2.1x more boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 824 MHz
- 3.2x more texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 171.4 GTexel/s
- 4.2x more pipelines: 10496 vs 2496
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 12 GB
- 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1060 vs 280
- 5.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26668 vs 4680
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 vs 17 Nov 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 562 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz vs 824 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s vs 171.4 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 10496 vs 2496 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 12 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 vs 280 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26668 vs 4680 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K80
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K80 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 280 | 1060 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4680 | 26668 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 191142 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 690.619 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 62.614 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 209.424 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5118 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K80 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Ampere |
Code name | GK210 | GA102 |
Launch date | 17 Nov 2014 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 374 | 46 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1499 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 824 MHz | 1695 MHz |
Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,371 GFLOPS (1:3) | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.113 TFLOPS | 35.58 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2496 | 10496 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.85 GPixel/s | 189.8 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 171.4 GTexel/s | 556.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 7100 million | 28300 million |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 313 mm (12.3 inches) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | 750 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Height | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
Width | Triple-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 24 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 240.6 GB/s | 936.2 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 384 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |