NVIDIA Tesla K80 vs NVIDIA P102-100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K80 and NVIDIA P102-100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80
- 541.7x more texture fill rate: 171.4 GTexel/s vs 316.4 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 5 GB
Texture fill rate | 171.4 GTexel/s vs 316.4 GTexel / s |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 5 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P102-100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1481 MHz vs 562 MHz
- Around 92% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 824 MHz
- Around 28% higher pipelines: 3200 vs 2496
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 8x more memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective
Launch date | 12 February 2018 vs 17 Nov 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1481 MHz vs 562 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 824 MHz |
Pipelines | 3200 vs 2496 |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K80
GPU 2: NVIDIA P102-100
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K80 | NVIDIA P102-100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 275 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5089 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 65766 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K80 | NVIDIA P102-100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Pascal |
Code name | GK210 | GP102 |
Launch date | 17 Nov 2014 | 12 February 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 349 | 313 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 824 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 1481 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,371 GFLOPS (1:3) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.113 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2496 | 3200 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.85 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 171.4 GTexel/s | 316.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 7100 million | 11,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 10,125 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x4 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 5 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 240.6 GB/s | 400.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 320 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective | 10008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |