NVIDIA NVS 2100M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 2100M and NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 2100M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 535 MHz vs 530 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 5.5x lower typical power consumption: 11 Watt vs 60 Watt
- 4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 152 vs 38
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 vs 29 July 2008 |
Core clock speed | 535 MHz vs 530 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 11 Watt vs 60 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 152 vs 38 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS
- 3x more texture fill rate: 12.72 GTexel / s vs 4.28 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 48 vs 16
- 3.2x better floating-point performance: 127.2 gflops vs 39.36 gflops
- Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1580 MHz
- Around 99% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 278 vs 140
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3297 vs 1249
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3297 vs 1249
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 12.72 GTexel / s vs 4.28 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 48 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 127.2 gflops vs 39.36 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1580 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 278 vs 140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3297 vs 1249 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3297 vs 1249 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 2100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA NVS 2100M | NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 140 | 278 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 152 | 38 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2609 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1249 | 3297 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1249 | 3297 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA NVS 2100M | NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT218 | G94 |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 | 29 July 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1450 | 1452 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 535 MHz | 530 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 39.36 gflops | 127.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 4.28 GTexel / s | 12.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 11 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 260 million | 505 million |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Gigaflops | 180 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.64 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
PureVideo HD |