NVIDIA NVS 3100M vs NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 3100M and NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 3100M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 606 MHz vs 589 MHz
- Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 4.85 GTexel / s vs 4.71 GTexel / s
- Around 5% better floating-point performance: 46.98 gflops vs 44.86 gflops
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 31 Watt
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 1580 MHz vs 666 MHz
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2905 vs 2724
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 vs 27 November 2009 |
Core clock speed | 606 MHz vs 589 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 4.85 GTexel / s vs 4.71 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 46.98 gflops vs 44.86 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 31 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz vs 666 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2905 vs 2724 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 140 vs 116
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 41 vs 35
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1052 vs 988
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1052 vs 988
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 140 vs 116 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 41 vs 35 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1052 vs 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1052 vs 988 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 3100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA NVS 3100M | NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 116 | 140 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 35 | 41 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2905 | 2724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 578 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 578 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 988 | 1052 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 988 | 1052 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA NVS 3100M | NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GT218 | GT218 |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 | 27 November 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1642 | 1645 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 606 MHz | 589 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 46.98 gflops | 44.86 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 4.85 GTexel / s | 4.71 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | 31 Watt |
Transistor count | 260 million | 260 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.64 GB / s | 5.33 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz | 666 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR3 | DDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 |