NVIDIA NVS 3100M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 3100M and NVIDIA GeForce 9400M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 3100M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 4% higher core clock speed: 606 MHz vs 580 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 116 vs 101

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9400M

• Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 14 Watt
• Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 55 vs 35
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1117 vs 988
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1117 vs 988

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 3100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9400M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	116 101
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	35 55
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	988 1117
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	988 1117

Compare specifications (specs)