NVIDIA NVS 315 vs AMD Radeon HD 6470M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 315 and AMD Radeon HD 6470M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 315

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
• Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 320 vs 226
• Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 180 vs 105
• Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 882 vs 729
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.025 vs 2.282

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6470M

• Around 34% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 523 MHz
• Around 34% higher texture fill rate: 5.6 GTexel / s vs 4.184 GTexel / s
• 3.3x more pipelines: 160 vs 48
• 2.2x better floating-point performance: 224 gflops vs 100.4 gflops
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 112.819 vs 79.479
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.276 vs 0.217
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 5.671 vs 4.705
• 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.025 vs 6.573
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 589 vs 465
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1251 vs 942
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1881 vs 1382
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 589 vs 465
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1251 vs 942
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1881 vs 1382

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 315
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6470M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	320 226
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	180 105
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	882 729
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.025 2.282
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	79.479 112.819
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.217 0.276
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.705 5.671
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.573 23.025
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	465 589
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	942 1251
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1382 1881
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	465 589
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	942 1251
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1382 1881

Compare specifications (specs)