NVIDIA NVS 5200M vs AMD Radeon HD 7650M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 5200M and AMD Radeon HD 7650M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5200M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
  • Around 49% higher core clock speed: 672 MHz vs 450 MHz
  • Around 96% higher memory clock speed: 3140 MHz vs 1600 MHz
  • Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 509 vs 438
  • 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 188 vs 59
  • Around 82% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2169 vs 1192
  • Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.829 vs 3.699
  • Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.539 vs 0.375
  • Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2715 vs 1733
  • Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2715 vs 1733
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 17 September 2012 vs 7 January 2012
Core clock speed 672 MHz vs 450 MHz
Memory clock speed 3140 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 509 vs 438
PassMark - G2D Mark 188 vs 59
Geekbench - OpenCL 2169 vs 1192
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 5.829 vs 3.699
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.539 vs 0.375
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2715 vs 1733
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2715 vs 1733

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7650M

  • 5x more pipelines: 480 vs 96
  • Around 67% better floating-point performance: 432.0 gflops vs 258.0 gflops
  • Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 25 Watt
  • Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 220.859 vs 189.966
  • 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 44.624 vs 16.851
  • 4.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1042 vs 222
  • Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1949 vs 1099
  • 4.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1042 vs 222
  • Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1949 vs 1099
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 10.8 GTexel / s vs 10.75 GTexel / s
Pipelines 480 vs 96
Floating-point performance 432.0 gflops vs 258.0 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 20 Watt vs 25 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 220.859 vs 189.966
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 44.624 vs 16.851
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1042 vs 222
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1949 vs 1099
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1042 vs 222
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1949 vs 1099

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 5200M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7650M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
509
438
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
188
59
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2169
1192
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5.829
3.699
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
189.966
220.859
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.539
0.375
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16.851
44.624
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
222
1042
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1099
1949
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2715
1733
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
222
1042
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1099
1949
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2715
1733
Name NVIDIA NVS 5200M AMD Radeon HD 7650M
PassMark - G3D Mark 509 438
PassMark - G2D Mark 188 59
Geekbench - OpenCL 2169 1192
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 5.829 3.699
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 189.966 220.859
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.539 0.375
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 9.643
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 16.851 44.624
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 222 1042
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1099 1949
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2715 1733
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 222 1042
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1099 1949
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2715 1733
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 680

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA NVS 5200M AMD Radeon HD 7650M

Essentials

Architecture Fermi TeraScale 2
Code name GF108 Thames
Launch date 17 September 2012 7 January 2012
Place in performance rating 1515 1517
Type Mobile workstation Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 672 MHz 450 MHz
Floating-point performance 258.0 gflops 432.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 96 480
Texture fill rate 10.75 GTexel / s 10.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt 20 Watt
Transistor count 585 million 716 million
Boost clock speed 550 MHz

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 25.12 GB / s 25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 3140 MHz 1600 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3
Shared memory 0 0