NVIDIA NVS 5200M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 5200M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5200M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 79% higher texture fill rate: 10.75 GTexel / s vs 6.0 billion / sec
• Around 34% better floating-point performance: 258.0 gflops vs 192 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
• 3.9x more memory clock speed: 3140 MHz vs 800 MHz
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 507 vs 394
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 188 vs 88
• Around 35% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2130 vs 1583
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.829 vs 4.329
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 189.966 vs 162.162
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.539 vs 0.426
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.851 vs 12.306

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M

• Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 672 MHz
• Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 25 Watt
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 737 vs 222
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1731 vs 1099
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2906 vs 2715
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 737 vs 222
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1731 vs 1099
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2906 vs 2715

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 5200M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	507 394
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	188 88
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2130 1583
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.829 4.329
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	189.966 162.162
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.539 0.426
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.851 12.306
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	222 737
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1099 1731
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2715 2906
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	222 737
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1099 1731
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2715 2906

Compare specifications (specs)