NVIDIA NVS 5200M versus AMD Radeon HD 7650M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA NVS 5200M and AMD Radeon HD 7650M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA NVS 5200M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 49% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 672 MHz versus 450 MHz
- Environ 96% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 3140 MHz versus 1600 MHz
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 509 versus 438
- 3.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 188 versus 59
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2169 versus 1192
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.829 versus 3.699
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.539 versus 0.375
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2715 versus 1733
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2715 versus 1733
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 17 September 2012 versus 7 January 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 672 MHz versus 450 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3140 MHz versus 1600 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 509 versus 438 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 188 versus 59 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2169 versus 1192 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.829 versus 3.699 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.539 versus 0.375 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2715 versus 1733 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2715 versus 1733 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7650M
- 5x plus de pipelines: 480 versus 96
- Environ 67% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 432.0 gflops versus 258.0 gflops
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 20 Watt versus 25 Watt
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 220.859 versus 189.966
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 44.624 versus 16.851
- 4.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1042 versus 222
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1949 versus 1099
- 4.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1042 versus 222
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1949 versus 1099
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 10.8 GTexel / s versus 10.75 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 480 versus 96 |
Performance á point flottant | 432.0 gflops versus 258.0 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt versus 25 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 220.859 versus 189.966 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.624 versus 16.851 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1042 versus 222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1949 versus 1099 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1042 versus 222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1949 versus 1099 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 5200M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7650M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA NVS 5200M | AMD Radeon HD 7650M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 509 | 438 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 188 | 59 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2169 | 1192 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.829 | 3.699 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 189.966 | 220.859 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.539 | 0.375 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.643 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.851 | 44.624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 222 | 1042 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1099 | 1949 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2715 | 1733 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 222 | 1042 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1099 | 1949 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2715 | 1733 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 680 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA NVS 5200M | AMD Radeon HD 7650M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GF108 | Thames |
Date de sortie | 17 September 2012 | 7 January 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1515 | 1517 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 672 MHz | 450 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 258.0 gflops | 432.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 480 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 10.75 GTexel / s | 10.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 20 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 716 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 550 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | MXM | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | medium sized |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 25.12 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3140 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |