NVIDIA NVS 5400M vs ATI Radeon HD 4670
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 5400M and ATI Radeon HD 4670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5400M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 69% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 59 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 626 vs 380
- 4.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 187 vs 39
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 June 2012 vs 10 September 2008 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 59 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 626 vs 380 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 187 vs 39 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4670
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 660 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 24 GTexel / s vs 10.56 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 96
- Around 89% better floating-point performance: 480.0 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3285 vs 2282
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3285 vs 2282
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz vs 660 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 24 GTexel / s vs 10.56 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 320 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops vs 253.4 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3285 vs 2282 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3285 vs 2282 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 5400M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4670
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA NVS 5400M | ATI Radeon HD 4670 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 626 | 380 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 187 | 39 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2353 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.068 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 229.562 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.384 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.696 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1069 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1652 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2282 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1069 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1652 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2282 | 3285 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA NVS 5400M | ATI Radeon HD 4670 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale |
Code name | GF108 | RV730 |
Launch date | 1 June 2012 | 10 September 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1426 | 1429 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $67 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 660 MHz | 750 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 253.4 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 10.56 GTexel / s | 24 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 59 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 514 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Length | 193 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |