NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA NVS 5400M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K620M and NVIDIA NVS 5400M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).

NVIDIA Quadro K620M

NVIDIA NVS 5400M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620M

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
Around 56% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 660 MHz
Around 70% higher texture fill rate: 17.98 GTexel / s vs 10.56 GTexel / s
4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
3.4x better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 35 Watt
Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1165 vs 626
2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5400 vs 2353
4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.872 vs 5.068
4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 91.813 vs 19.696
Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1291 vs 1069
Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1291 vs 1069

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 March 2015 vs 1 June 2012
Core clock speed	1029 MHz vs 660 MHz
Texture fill rate	17.98 GTexel / s vs 10.56 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 vs 96
Floating-point performance	863.2 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 35 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1165 vs 626
Geekbench - OpenCL	5400 vs 2353
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	23.872 vs 5.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	91.813 vs 19.696
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1291 vs 1069
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1291 vs 1069

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5400M

Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 187 vs 158
Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 229.562 vs 165.904
Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1652 vs 927
Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2282 vs 1349
Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1652 vs 927
Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2282 vs 1349

Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	187 vs 158
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	229.562 vs 165.904
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1652 vs 927
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2282 vs 1349
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1652 vs 927
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2282 vs 1349

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620M
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 5400M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1165

626

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

158

187

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

5400

2353

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

23.872

5.068

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

165.904

229.562

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

91.813

19.696

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1291

1069

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

927

1652

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1349

2282

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1291

1069

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

927

1652

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1349

2282

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K620M	NVIDIA NVS 5400M
PassMark - G3D Mark	1165	626
PassMark - G2D Mark	158	187
Geekbench - OpenCL	5400	2353
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	23.872	5.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	165.904	229.562
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	91.813	19.696
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1291	1069
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	927	1652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1349	2282
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1291	1069
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	927	1652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1349	2282
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.635
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		11.384

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K620M	NVIDIA NVS 5400M
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi
Code name	GM108	GF108
Launch date	1 March 2015	1 June 2012
Place in performance rating	1425	1426
Type	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz
Core clock speed	1029 MHz	660 MHz
Floating-point performance	863.2 gflops	253.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	384	96
Texture fill rate	17.98 GTexel / s	10.56 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt	35 Watt
Transistor count		585 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	MXM
Supplementary power connectors	None
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Shader Model	5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB / s	28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	DDR3
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
nView Display Management
Optimus
DirectCompute
DirectX 11		DirectX 11