NVIDIA NVS 5400M vs AMD Radeon HD 6570

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 5400M and AMD Radeon HD 6570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5400M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 40 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 2x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 626 vs 557
• Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2353 vs 1547
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.068 vs 4.278
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.635 vs 0.464
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1652 vs 1044
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1652 vs 1044

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6570

• Around 48% higher texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 10.56 GTexel / s
• 5x more pipelines: 480 vs 96
• 2.5x better floating-point performance: 624.0 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 218 vs 187
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 255.525 vs 229.562
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.633 vs 11.384
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 59.183 vs 19.696
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1296 vs 1069
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2716 vs 2282
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1296 vs 1069
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2716 vs 2282

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 5400M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6570

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	626 557
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	187 218
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2353 1547
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.068 4.278
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	229.562 255.525
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.635 0.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.384 13.633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.696 59.183
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1069 1296
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1652 1044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2282 2716
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1069 1296
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1652 1044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2282 2716

Compare specifications (specs)