NVIDIA NVS 810 vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 810 and NVIDIA GRID K260Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 810
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 902 MHz vs 745 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 2x 33.06 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 95.36 GTexel / s
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 68 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2x 2 GB vs 2 GB
Launch date | 4 November 2015 vs 28 June 2013 |
Core clock speed | 902 MHz vs 745 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 2x 33.06 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 95.36 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 68 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2x 2 GB vs 2 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K260Q
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 2x 512
- Around 8% better floating-point performance: 2,289 gflops vs 2x 1,058 gflops
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2949 vs 1179
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 vs 297
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 2x 512 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops vs 2x 1,058 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2949 vs 1179 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 vs 297 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 810
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K260Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA NVS 810 | NVIDIA GRID K260Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1179 | 2949 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 297 | 361 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 24237 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6474 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6474 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1898 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1898 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1954 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1954 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA NVS 810 | NVIDIA GRID K260Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM107 | GK104 |
Launch date | 4 November 2015 | 28 June 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 581 | 545 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $937 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 902 MHz | 745 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,058 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 512 | 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 33.06 GTexel / s billion / sec | 95.36 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 68 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 8x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 198 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 14.4 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |