NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs NVIDIA NVS 810
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) and NVIDIA NVS 810 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 902 MHz
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1033 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.9x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 4.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5030 vs 1190
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 459 vs 295
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 October 2016 vs 4 November 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1290 MHz vs 902 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 1033 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5030 vs 1190 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 459 vs 295 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 810
- 4x more texture fill rate: 2x 33.06 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 58.2 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 2x 512 vs 640
- Around 14% better floating-point performance: 2x 1,058 gflops vs 1,862 gflops
- Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 68 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 39% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 24237 vs 17470
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 33.06 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 58.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 512 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,058 gflops vs 1,862 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 68 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 24237 vs 17470 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 810
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | NVIDIA NVS 810 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5030 | 1190 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 459 | 295 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17470 | 24237 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7043 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7043 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1810 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | NVIDIA NVS 810 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
Code name | GP107 | GM107 |
Launch date | 25 October 2016 | 4 November 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Place in performance rating | 580 | 582 |
Price now | $124.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 56.95 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1290 MHz | 902 MHz |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,862 gflops | 2x 1,058 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 640 | 2x 512 |
Texture fill rate | 58.2 GTexel / s | 2x 33.06 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 68 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | 8x mini-DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 198 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2x 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | 2x 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2x 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
VR Ready |