NVIDIA NVS 810 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 810 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 810
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 2x 33.06 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 94.1 billion / sec
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 68 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2x 2 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 70% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 24237 vs 14261
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 November 2015 vs 25 June 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 33.06 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 94.1 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 68 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2x 2 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 24237 vs 14261 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 902 MHz
- Around 13% higher pipelines: 1152 vs 2x 512
- Around 12% better floating-point performance: 2,378 gflops vs 2x 1,058 gflops
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4803 vs 1190
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 532 vs 295
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 902 MHz |
Pipelines | 1152 vs 2x 512 |
Floating-point performance | 2,378 gflops vs 2x 1,058 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4803 vs 1190 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 vs 295 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 810
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA NVS 810 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1190 | 4803 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 295 | 532 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 24237 | 14261 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.505 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.402 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.09 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.457 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.186 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6927 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6927 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1659 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA NVS 810 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM107 | GK104 |
Launch date | 4 November 2015 | 25 June 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 597 | 576 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
Price now | $249.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 23.69 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Core clock speed | 902 MHz | 980 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,058 gflops | 2,378 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 512 | 1152 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 33.06 GTexel / s billion / sec | 94.1 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 68 Watt | 170 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
CUDA cores | 1152 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 8x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 198 mm | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Minimum recommended system power | 500 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 14.4 GB / s | 192.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
PhysX | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |