NVIDIA NVS 810 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 810 and NVIDIA Tesla C2050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA NVS 810

NVIDIA Tesla C2050

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 810

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 57% higher core clock speed: 902 MHz vs 575 MHz
7.2x more texture fill rate: 2x 33.06 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 32.2 GTexel / s
2.3x more pipelines: 2x 512 vs 448
2.1x better floating-point performance: 2x 1,058 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
3.5x lower typical power consumption: 68 Watt vs 238 Watt
Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2x 2 GB vs 3 GB
2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 24237 vs 11024

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	4 November 2015 vs 25 July 2011
Core clock speed	902 MHz vs 575 MHz
Texture fill rate	2x 33.06 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 32.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2x 512 vs 448
Floating-point performance	2x 1,058 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	68 Watt vs 238 Watt
Maximum memory size	2x 2 GB vs 3 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	24237 vs 11024

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2050

Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 3000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3176 vs 1190
Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 362 vs 295

Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed	3000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3176 vs 1190
PassMark - G2D Mark	362 vs 295

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 810
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2050

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1190

3176

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

295

362

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

24237

11024

Name	NVIDIA NVS 810	NVIDIA Tesla C2050
PassMark - G3D Mark	1190	3176
PassMark - G2D Mark	295	362
Geekbench - OpenCL	24237	11024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		26.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		901.157
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		2.99
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		41.654
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		89.869
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		5962
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		9064
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		5962
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		9064

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA NVS 810	NVIDIA Tesla C2050
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi
Code name	GM107	GF100
Launch date	4 November 2015	25 July 2011
Place in performance rating	582	585
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1033 MHz
Core clock speed	902 MHz	575 MHz
Floating-point performance	2x 1,058 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	2x 512	448
Texture fill rate	2x 33.06 GTexel / s billion / sec	32.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	68 Watt	238 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	3,100 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	8x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	198 mm	248 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2x 2 GB	3 GB
Memory bandwidth	2x 14.4 GB / s	144.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	2x 64 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	3000 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5