NVIDIA P102-100 vs AMD Radeon R9 390
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA P102-100 and AMD Radeon R9 390 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P102-100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 58% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 98% higher texture fill rate: 316.4 GTexel / s vs 160.0 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 3200 vs 2560
- Around 98% better floating-point performance: 10,125 gflops vs 5,120 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 275 Watt
- 10x more memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 50% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 65631 vs 43795
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 February 2018 vs 18 June 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 316.4 GTexel / s vs 160.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3200 vs 2560 |
Floating-point performance | 10,125 gflops vs 5,120 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 65631 vs 43795 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390
- Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 5 GB
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 5 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA P102-100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA P102-100 | AMD Radeon R9 390 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 65631 | 43795 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8910 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 797 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 120.267 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3164.164 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.097 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.473 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.381 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10445 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10445 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3949 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA P102-100 | AMD Radeon R9 390 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | GP102 | Grenada |
Launch date | 12 February 2018 | 18 June 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | $329 |
Place in performance rating | 309 | 307 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1481 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 10,125 gflops | 5,120 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 3200 | 2560 |
Texture fill rate | 316.4 GTexel / s | 160.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 275 Watt |
Transistor count | 11,800 million | 6,200 million |
Compute units | 40 | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 275 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 400.3 GB / s | 384 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 512 bit |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |