NVIDIA P106-100 vs AMD FirePro S10000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA P106-100 and AMD FirePro S10000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P106-100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 83% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 825 MHz
• Around 80% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 950 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 6.3x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 750 Watt
• Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 5000 MHz
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6445 vs 4768
• Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36328 vs 30631
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 163.993 vs 73.836
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.266 vs 6.978
• Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12824 vs 7867
• Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12824 vs 7867

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S10000

• 15.4x more texture fill rate: 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 136.7 GTexel / s
• 3.2x more pipelines: 4096 vs 1280
• Around 56% better floating-point performance: 2x 3,405 gflops vs 4,375 gflops
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 502 vs 244
• Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3621 vs 1860
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3321 vs 1680
• Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3621 vs 1860
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3321 vs 1680

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA P106-100
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S10000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6445 4768
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	244 502
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	36328 30631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	163.993 73.836
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.266 6.978
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12824 7867
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1860 3621
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1680 3321
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12824 7867
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1860 3621
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1680 3321

Compare specifications (specs)