NVIDIA P106-100 vs AMD Radeon HD 7990

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA P106-100 and AMD Radeon HD 7990 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P106-100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 59% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 950 MHz
• Around 71% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 375 Watt
• Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 6000 MHz
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6357 vs 5566
• Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 163.993 vs 88.665
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.266 vs 8.437
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 448.036 vs 434.598
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12824 vs 6689
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12824 vs 6689

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7990

• 15.6x more texture fill rate: 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 136.7 GTexel / s
• 3.2x more pipelines: 2x 2048 vs 1280
• Around 87% better floating-point performance: 2x 4,096 gflops vs 4,375 gflops
• 3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 vs 255
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1753.494 vs 1705.321
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 88.328 vs 76.32
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 vs 1860
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1680
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 vs 1860
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1680

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA P106-100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7990

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6357 5566
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	255 766
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	163.993 88.665
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1705.321 1753.494
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.266 8.437
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	76.32 88.328
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	448.036 434.598
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12824 6689
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1860 3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1680 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12824 6689
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1860 3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1680 3356

Compare specifications (specs)