NVIDIA P106-100 vs AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA P106-100 and AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P106-100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 926 MHz
- Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 1206 MHz
- 892.9x better floating-point performance: 4,375 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 21% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 6600 MHz
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36174 vs 33787
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 163.993 vs 111.543
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12824 vs 9983
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12824 vs 9983
- Around 7% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 899 vs 842
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 June 2017 vs 4 August 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 926 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1709 MHz vs 1206 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 6600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36174 vs 33787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 163.993 vs 111.543 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12824 vs 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1680 vs 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12824 vs 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1680 vs 1674 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 899 vs 842 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
- Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 154.4 GTexel / s vs 136.7 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7965 vs 6724
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 723 vs 251
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1817.005 vs 1705.321
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.511 vs 9.266
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.875 vs 76.32
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 511.362 vs 448.036
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2443 vs 1860
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2443 vs 1860
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 154.4 GTexel / s vs 136.7 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1280 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7965 vs 6724 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 723 vs 251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 vs 1705.321 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 vs 9.266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 vs 76.32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 vs 448.036 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2443 vs 1860 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2443 vs 1860 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA P106-100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA P106-100 | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6724 | 7965 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 251 | 723 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36174 | 33787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 163.993 | 111.543 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1705.321 | 1817.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.266 | 9.511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.32 | 99.875 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 448.036 | 511.362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12824 | 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1860 | 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1680 | 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12824 | 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1860 | 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1680 | 1674 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 899 | 842 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA P106-100 | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GP106 | Ellesmere |
Launch date | 19 June 2017 | 4 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 439 | 389 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Price now | $109.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 100.00 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1709 MHz | 1206 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 926 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops | 4.9 TFLOPs |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 136.7 GTexel / s | 154.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 5,700 million |
Compute units | 32 | |
GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 250 mm | 241 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | 211 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 6600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |