NVIDIA P106-100 vs AMD Radeon RX 580

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA P106-100 and AMD Radeon RX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P106-100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1257 MHz
• Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 1340 MHz
• 705.6x better floating-point performance: 4,375 gflops vs 6.2 TFLOPs
• Around 54% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 185 Watt
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 163.993 vs 116.142
• Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1705.321 vs 1022.932
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12824 vs 11281
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12824 vs 11281

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580

• 1411.6x more texture fill rate: 192.96 GTexel/s vs 136.7 GTexel / s
• Around 80% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1280
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8827 vs 6724
• 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 767 vs 251
• Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39028 vs 36174
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 84.034 vs 76.32
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 607.721 vs 448.036
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 vs 1860
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 1680
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 vs 1860
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 1680
• Around 12% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1005 vs 899

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA P106-100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6724 8827
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	251 767
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	36174 39028
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	163.993 116.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1705.321 1022.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.266 9.235
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	76.32 84.034
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	448.036 607.721
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12824 11281
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1860 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1680 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12824 11281
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1860 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1680 3349
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	899 1005

Compare specifications (specs)