NVIDIA P106-100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA P106-100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P106-100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1127 MHz
• Around 45% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 1178 MHz
• Around 90% higher texture fill rate: 136.7 GTexel / s vs 72 billion / sec
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
• Around 81% better floating-point performance: 4,375 gflops vs 2,413 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
• 1144x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6724 vs 6111
• Around 93% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36174 vs 18734
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 163.993 vs 73.733
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1705.321 vs 792.44
• Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.266 vs 4.888
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 76.32 vs 35.338
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 448.036 vs 200.825
• Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12824 vs 7218
• Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12824 vs 7218
• 5.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 899 vs 162

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

• 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 vs 251
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 vs 1860
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 vs 1680
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 vs 1860
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3335 vs 1680

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA P106-100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6724 6111
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	251 673
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	36174 18734
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	163.993 73.733
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1705.321 792.44
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.266 4.888
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	76.32 35.338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	448.036 200.825
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12824 7218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1860 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1680 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12824 7218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1860 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1680 3335
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	899 162

Compare specifications (specs)