NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 2000D and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 71% lower typical power consumption: 62 Watt vs 106 Watt
- Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 323 vs 308
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 320.57 vs 302.509
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 31.168 vs 27.656
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3447 vs 3365
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3325
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3447 vs 3365
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3325
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 October 2011 vs 13 September 2010 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 62 Watt vs 106 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz vs 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 vs 308 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 320.57 vs 302.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.168 vs 27.656 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3447 vs 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3447 vs 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3325 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1566 MHz vs 625 MHz
- Around 26% higher texture fill rate: 25.1 billion / sec vs 20 GTexel / s
- Around 25% better floating-point performance: 601.3 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1317 vs 976
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4935 vs 3926
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.758 vs 11.122
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.925 vs 12.67
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2160 vs 1453
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2160 vs 1453
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1566 MHz vs 625 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 25.1 billion / sec vs 20 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 601.3 gflops vs 480.0 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1317 vs 976 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4935 vs 3926 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.758 vs 11.122 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.925 vs 12.67 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2160 vs 1453 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2160 vs 1453 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro 2000D | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 976 | 1317 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | 308 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3926 | 4935 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.122 | 14.758 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 320.57 | 302.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | 0.965 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.67 | 14.925 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.168 | 27.656 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1453 | 2160 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3447 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1453 | 2160 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3447 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3325 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro 2000D | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Code name | GF106 | GF106 |
| Launch date | 5 October 2011 | 13 September 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | $129 |
| Place in performance rating | 1133 | 1135 |
| Price now | $209 | $64.99 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.27 | 26.46 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 1566 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 601.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 192 |
| Texture fill rate | 20 GTexel / s | 25.1 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 62 Watt | 106 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 1,170 million |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 100 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 178 mm | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB / s | 57.7 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro 2000D with others
NVIDIAQuadro 2000D vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7050 + nForce 630i
NVIDIAQuadro 2000D vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450
NVIDIAQuadro 2000D vs
AMDRadeon E6760
NVIDIAQuadro 2000D vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760M
NVIDIAQuadro 2000D vs
IntelHD Graphics 6000
NVIDIAQuadro 2000D vs
AMDFirePro W5130M
