NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 4000 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 15.2 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 256 vs 80
- 4.1x better floating-point performance: 486.4 gflops vs 120 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 6.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1478 vs 236
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 379 vs 362
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4974 vs 2112
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3472 vs 1247
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 1679
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3472 vs 1247
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 1679
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 November 2010 vs 7 January 2010 |
| Texture fill rate | 15.2 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 256 vs 80 |
| Floating-point performance | 486.4 gflops vs 120 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1478 vs 236 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 379 vs 362 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4974 vs 2112 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3472 vs 1247 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 1679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3472 vs 1247 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 1679 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
- Around 58% higher core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 475 MHz
- 9.5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 142 Watt
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 2808 MHz
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz vs 475 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 142 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 2808 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 4000
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro 4000 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1478 | 236 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 379 | 362 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4974 | 2112 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.345 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 306.122 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.552 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.453 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 39.651 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2079 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3472 | 1247 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 1679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2079 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3472 | 1247 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 1679 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro 4000 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GF100 | Park |
| Launch date | 2 November 2010 | 7 January 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,199 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1059 | 1060 |
| Price now | $141.66 | |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.08 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 475 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 486.4 gflops | 120 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 256 | 80 |
| Texture fill rate | 15.2 GTexel / s | 6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 142 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 89.9 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2808 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2, GDDR2, DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro 4000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro 4000 vs
ATIRadeon 9800 XT
NVIDIAQuadro 4000 vs
ATIRadeon X850 PRO
NVIDIAQuadro 4000 vs
ATIRadeon HD 3650 AGP
NVIDIAQuadro 4000 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5470
NVIDIAQuadro 4000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8350 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro 4000 vs
IntelIris Graphics 540
