NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 4000 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 15.2 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 256 vs 80
- 4.1x better floating-point performance: 486.4 gflops vs 120 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 6.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1478 vs 236
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 380 vs 362
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5023 vs 2112
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3472 vs 1247
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 1679
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3472 vs 1247
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 1679
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 November 2010 vs 7 January 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 15.2 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 256 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 486.4 gflops vs 120 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1478 vs 236 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 380 vs 362 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5023 vs 2112 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3472 vs 1247 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 1679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3472 vs 1247 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 1679 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
- Around 58% higher core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 475 MHz
- 9.5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 142 Watt
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 2808 MHz
Core clock speed | 750 MHz vs 475 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 142 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 2808 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 4000
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro 4000 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1478 | 236 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 380 | 362 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5023 | 2112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.345 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 306.122 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.552 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.453 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 39.651 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2079 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3472 | 1247 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 1679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2079 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3472 | 1247 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 1679 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GF100 | Park |
Launch date | 2 November 2010 | 7 January 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,199 | |
Place in performance rating | 1068 | 1069 |
Price now | $141.66 | |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.08 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 475 MHz | 750 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 486.4 gflops | 120 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 15.2 GTexel / s | 6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 142 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 89.9 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2808 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2, GDDR2, DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |