AMD Radeon R7 250E vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 250E and NVIDIA Quadro 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250E
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 68% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 475 MHz
- Around 68% higher texture fill rate: 25.6 GTexel / s vs 15.2 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 512 vs 256
- Around 68% better floating-point performance: 819.2 gflops vs 486.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 142 Watt
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 2808 MHz
- Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.562 vs 13.345
- Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 582.073 vs 306.122
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.2 vs 1.552
- Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.669 vs 20.453
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 98.052 vs 39.651
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2873 vs 2079
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 3472
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2873 vs 2079
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 3472
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 20 December 2013 vs 2 November 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 475 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s vs 15.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 256 |
| Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops vs 486.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 142 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 2808 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.562 vs 13.345 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 582.073 vs 306.122 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.2 vs 1.552 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.669 vs 20.453 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.052 vs 39.651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2873 vs 2079 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 3472 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2873 vs 2079 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 3472 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3350 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 4000
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 250E
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 4000
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 250E | NVIDIA Quadro 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.562 | 13.345 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 582.073 | 306.122 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.2 | 1.552 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.669 | 20.453 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.052 | 39.651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2873 | 2079 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 3472 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2873 | 2079 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 3472 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1476 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 382 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5013 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 250E | NVIDIA Quadro 4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Cape Verde | GF100 |
| Launch date | 20 December 2013 | 2 November 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | $1,199 |
| Place in performance rating | 1046 | 1047 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Price now | $141.66 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.08 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 475 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops | 486.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 256 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s | 15.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 142 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | 241 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 89.9 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 2808 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 250E with others
AMDRadeon R7 250E vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 Ti 4400
AMDRadeon R7 250E vs
VIAChrome9 HC
AMDRadeon R7 250E vs
NVIDIAGeForce G205M
AMDRadeon R7 250E vs
NVIDIAQuadro 4000
AMDRadeon R7 250E vs
AMDRadeon R5 M335
AMDRadeon R7 250E vs
AMDRadeon Vega 7
