NVIDIA Quadro 4000M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 4000M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 6% higher core clock speed: 475 MHz vs 450 MHz
• 14.8x more texture fill rate: 26.6 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s
• 8.4x more pipelines: 336 vs 40
• 17.7x better floating-point performance: 638.4 gflops vs 36 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
• 3.1x more memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 800 MHz
• 14.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1278 vs 90
• Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 269 vs 212
• 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1254 vs 328
• 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1254 vs 328

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1278 90
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	269 212
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1254 328
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1254 328

Compare specifications (specs)