NVIDIA Quadro 5000 SDI vs NVIDIA NVS 4200M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 5000 SDI and NVIDIA NVS 4200M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 5000 SDI
- 3.5x more texture fill rate: 22.57 GTexel / s vs 6.48 GTexel / s
- 7.3x more pipelines: 352 vs 48
- 4.6x better floating-point performance: 722.3 gflops vs 155.52 gflops
- 2.5x more maximum memory size: 2560 MB vs 1 GB
- Around 88% higher memory clock speed: 3000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Texture fill rate | 22.57 GTexel / s vs 6.48 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 352 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 722.3 gflops vs 155.52 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2560 MB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 4200M
- Around 58% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 513 MHz
- 6.9x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 172 Watt
Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 513 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 172 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 5000 SDI
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 4200M
Name | NVIDIA Quadro 5000 SDI | NVIDIA NVS 4200M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 280 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 77 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1155 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.559 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 103.797 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.826 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.836 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 412 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 688 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1726 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 412 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 688 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1726 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro 5000 SDI | NVIDIA NVS 4200M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GF100 | GF119 |
Launch date | 23 February 2011 | 22 February 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $7,899 | |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1640 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 513 MHz | 810 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 722.3 gflops | 155.52 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 352 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 22.57 GTexel / s | 6.48 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 172 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video, 2x SDI | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM |
Length | 248 mm | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2560 MB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 120.0 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |