NVIDIA Quadro 600 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 600 and NVIDIA GeForce 210 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 10.24 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s
- 6x more pipelines: 96 vs 16
- 6.2x better floating-point performance: 245.76 gflops vs 39.36 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 4.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 526 vs 126
- 7.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 232 vs 30
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1255 vs 497
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2037 vs 688
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1255 vs 497
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2037 vs 688
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 December 2010 vs 12 October 2009 |
| Texture fill rate | 10.24 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 96 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 245.76 gflops vs 39.36 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 526 vs 126 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 vs 30 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1255 vs 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2037 vs 688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1255 vs 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2037 vs 688 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 210
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1402 MHz vs 640 MHz
- Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 30.5 Watt vs 40 Watt
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2438 vs 2100
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1402 MHz vs 640 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30.5 Watt vs 40 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2438 vs 2100 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 210
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro 600 | NVIDIA GeForce 210 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 526 | 126 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 | 30 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2100 | 2438 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.617 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 185.752 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.526 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.023 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.137 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 899 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1255 | 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2037 | 688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 899 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1255 | 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2037 | 688 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro 600 | NVIDIA GeForce 210 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GF108 | GT218 |
| Launch date | 13 December 2010 | 12 October 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | $29.49 |
| Place in performance rating | 1471 | 1674 |
| Price now | $299 | $32.99 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 2.80 | 6.81 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 640 MHz | 1402 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 245.76 gflops | 39.36 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 10.24 GTexel / s | 4.16 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 30.5 Watt |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 260 million |
| CUDA cores | 16 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA, DVIVGADisplayPort |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | 6.60" (16.8 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 2.731" (6.9 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 8.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR2 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro 600 with others
NVIDIAQuadro 600 vs
ATIRadeon HD 3650
NVIDIAQuadro 600 vs
NVIDIANVS 2100M
NVIDIAQuadro 600 vs
IntelGraphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150
NVIDIAQuadro 600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6530D IGP
NVIDIAQuadro 600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6370D IGP
NVIDIAQuadro 600 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 410
