NVIDIA Quadro 600 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 600 and NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 10.24 GTexel / s vs 4.4 billion / sec
- 6x more pipelines: 96 vs 16
- 8.4x better floating-point performance: 245.76 gflops vs 29.376 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 530 vs 162
- 5.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 232 vs 39
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2037 vs 1016
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2037 vs 1016
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 December 2010 vs 1 August 2008 |
| Texture fill rate | 10.24 GTexel / s vs 4.4 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 96 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 245.76 gflops vs 29.376 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 530 vs 162 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 vs 39 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2037 vs 1016 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2037 vs 1016 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 640 MHz
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1796 vs 1255
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1796 vs 1255
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 640 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1796 vs 1255 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1796 vs 1255 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro 600 | NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 530 | 162 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 | 39 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2104 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.617 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 185.752 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.526 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.023 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.137 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 899 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1255 | 1796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2037 | 1016 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 899 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1255 | 1796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2037 | 1016 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro 600 | NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla |
| Code name | GF108 | G86 |
| Launch date | 13 December 2010 | 1 August 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | $79.99 |
| Place in performance rating | 1465 | 1467 |
| Price now | $299 | $79.99 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 2.80 | 3.05 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 640 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 245.76 gflops | 29.376 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 10.24 GTexel / s | 4.4 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 210 million |
| CUDA cores | 16 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVI |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | 6.6" (16.8 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR2 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro 600 with others
NVIDIAQuadro 600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9300 GS
NVIDIAQuadro 600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9400 GT
NVIDIAQuadro 600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9800M GS
NVIDIAQuadro 600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6530D IGP
NVIDIAQuadro 600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6370D IGP
NVIDIAQuadro 600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7350 OEM
