NVIDIA Quadro 600 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 600 and NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 600

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • 2.3x more texture fill rate: 10.24 GTexel / s vs 4.4 billion / sec
  • 6x more pipelines: 96 vs 16
  • 8.4x better floating-point performance: 245.76 gflops vs 29.376 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
  • Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 50 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
  • 4x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 400 MHz
  • 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 531 vs 162
  • 5.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 232 vs 39
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2037 vs 1016
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2037 vs 1016
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 December 2010 vs 1 August 2008
Texture fill rate 10.24 GTexel / s vs 4.4 billion / sec
Pipelines 96 vs 16
Floating-point performance 245.76 gflops vs 29.376 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm vs 80 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 40 Watt vs 50 Watt
Maximum memory size 1 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz vs 400 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 531 vs 162
PassMark - G2D Mark 232 vs 39
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2037 vs 1016
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2037 vs 1016

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT

  • 2.2x more core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 640 MHz
  • Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1796 vs 1255
  • Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1796 vs 1255
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1400 MHz vs 640 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1796 vs 1255
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1796 vs 1255

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
531
162
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
232
39
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1255
1796
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2037
1016
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1255
1796
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2037
1016
Name NVIDIA Quadro 600 NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark 531 162
PassMark - G2D Mark 232 39
Geekbench - OpenCL 2117
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 5.617
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 185.752
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 9.023
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 16.137
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 899
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1255 1796
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2037 1016
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 899
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1255 1796
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2037 1016

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro 600 NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT

Essentials

Architecture Fermi Tesla
Code name GF108 G86
Launch date 13 December 2010 1 August 2008
Launch price (MSRP) $179 $79.99
Place in performance rating 1466 1468
Price now $299 $79.99
Type Workstation Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 2.80 3.05

Technical info

Core clock speed 640 MHz 1400 MHz
Floating-point performance 245.76 gflops 29.376 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 80 nm
Pipelines 96 16
Texture fill rate 10.24 GTexel / s 4.4 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 40 Watt 50 Watt
Transistor count 585 million 210 million
CUDA cores 16
Maximum GPU temperature 105 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVI
Audio input for HDMI S / PDIF
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 168 mm 6.6" (16.8 cm)
Supplementary power connectors None None
Bus support PCI-E 2.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 10.0
OpenGL 4.6 2.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 25.6 GB / s 12.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz 400 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR2

Technologies

CUDA
SLI