NVIDIA Quadro 600 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 600 and NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro 600

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 600

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
2.3x more texture fill rate: 10.24 GTexel / s vs 4.4 billion / sec
6x more pipelines: 96 vs 16
8.4x better floating-point performance: 245.76 gflops vs 29.376 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 50 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
4x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 400 MHz
3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 535 vs 145
5.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 230 vs 40
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2037 vs 1016
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2037 vs 1016

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 December 2010 vs 1 August 2008
Texture fill rate	10.24 GTexel / s vs 4.4 billion / sec
Pipelines	96 vs 16
Floating-point performance	245.76 gflops vs 29.376 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm vs 80 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt vs 50 Watt
Maximum memory size	1 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed	1600 MHz vs 400 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	535 vs 145
PassMark - G2D Mark	230 vs 40
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2037 vs 1016
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2037 vs 1016

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT

2.2x more core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 640 MHz
Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1796 vs 1255
Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1796 vs 1255

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1400 MHz vs 640 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1796 vs 1255
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1796 vs 1255

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

535

145

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

230

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1255

1796

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2037

1016

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1255

1796

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2037

1016

Name	NVIDIA Quadro 600	NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark	535	145
PassMark - G2D Mark	230	40
Geekbench - OpenCL	2056
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	5.617
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	185.752
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.444
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	8.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	16.137
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	899
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1255	1796
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2037	1016
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	899
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1255	1796
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2037	1016

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro 600	NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi	Tesla
Code name	GF108	G86
Launch date	13 December 2010	1 August 2008
Launch price (MSRP)	$179	$79.99
Place in performance rating	1460	1462
Price now	$299	$79.99
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Value for money (0-100)	2.80	3.05
Technical info
Core clock speed	640 MHz	1400 MHz
Floating-point performance	245.76 gflops	29.376 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	80 nm
Pipelines	96	16
Texture fill rate	10.24 GTexel / s	4.4 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt	50 Watt
Transistor count	585 million	210 million
CUDA cores		16
Maximum GPU temperature		105 °C
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVI
Audio input for HDMI		S / PDIF
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	168 mm	6.6" (16.8 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Bus support		PCI-E 2.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.0
OpenGL	4.6	2.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	512 MB
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB / s	12.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1600 MHz	400 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	DDR2
Technologies
CUDA
SLI