NVIDIA Quadro 600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 600 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 73% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 69 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 526 vs 501
- 5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 232 vs 46
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2037 vs 1385
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2037 vs 1385
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 December 2010 vs 17 November 2009 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 69 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 526 vs 501 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 vs 46 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2037 vs 1385 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2037 vs 1385 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1340 MHz vs 640 MHz
- Around 72% higher texture fill rate: 17.6 GTexel / s vs 10.24 GTexel / s
- Around 5% better floating-point performance: 257.28 gflops vs 245.76 gflops
- Around 6% higher memory clock speed: 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 4.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9236 vs 2100
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1979 vs 1255
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1979 vs 1255
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1340 MHz vs 640 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s vs 10.24 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 257.28 gflops vs 245.76 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9236 vs 2100 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1979 vs 1255 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1979 vs 1255 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro 600 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 526 | 501 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 | 46 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2100 | 9236 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.617 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 185.752 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.526 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.023 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.137 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 899 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1255 | 1979 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2037 | 1385 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 899 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1255 | 1979 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2037 | 1385 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro 600 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GF108 | GT215 |
| Launch date | 13 December 2010 | 17 November 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | $80 |
| Place in performance rating | 1471 | 1394 |
| Price now | $299 | $37.99 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 2.80 | 22.27 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 640 MHz | 1340 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 245.76 gflops | 257.28 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 96 |
| Texture fill rate | 10.24 GTexel / s | 17.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 69 Watt |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 727 million |
| CUDA cores | 96 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105C C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | DVIVGAHDMI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | 6.6" (168mm) (16.8 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.2 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB or 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 54.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro 600 with others
NVIDIAQuadro 600 vs
ATIRadeon HD 3650
NVIDIAQuadro 600 vs
NVIDIANVS 2100M
NVIDIAQuadro 600 vs
IntelGraphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150
NVIDIAQuadro 600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6530D IGP
NVIDIAQuadro 600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6370D IGP
NVIDIAQuadro 600 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 410
