AMD Radeon HD 6570 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6570 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 7.5x more pipelines: 480 vs 64
- 3.5x better floating-point performance: 624.0 gflops vs 176 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 48% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 59 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 768 MB
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 547 vs 398
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 217 vs 58
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 February 2011 vs 30 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 480 vs 64 |
| Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops vs 176 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 59 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 768 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 547 vs 398 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 vs 58 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
- Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 17.6 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2917 vs 2716
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2917 vs 2716
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2917 vs 2716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2917 vs 2716 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6570
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 6570 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 547 | 398 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 | 58 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1553 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.278 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 255.525 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.464 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.633 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 59.183 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1296 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1044 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2716 | 2917 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1296 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1044 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2716 | 2917 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 846 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 6570 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
| Code name | Thames | G94 |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
| Launch date | 7 February 2011 | 30 March 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | $489 |
| Place in performance rating | 1424 | 1427 |
| Price now | $49.99 | $186.29 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 19.92 | 4.05 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops | 176 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 480 | 64 |
| Stream Processors | 480 | |
| Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s | 17.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 59 Watt |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 505 million |
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | 198 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 768 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 38.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon HD 6570 with others
AMDRadeon HD 6570 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1800
AMDRadeon HD 6570 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 230
AMDRadeon HD 6570 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5670
AMDRadeon HD 6570 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6520G
AMDRadeon HD 6570 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 555M
AMDRadeon HD 6570 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7670M
