NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 230
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 550 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 70 vs 60
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3233 vs 2917
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3233 vs 2917
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 October 2009 vs 30 March 2009 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 70 vs 60 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3233 vs 2917 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3233 vs 2917 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
- Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 17.6 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 64 vs 48
- Around 13% better floating-point performance: 176 gflops vs 156 gflops
- Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 59 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 768 MB vs 512 MB
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 402 vs 323
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 64 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 176 gflops vs 156 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 59 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 768 MB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 402 vs 323 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 230
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 323 | 402 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 70 | 60 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3233 | 2917 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3233 | 2917 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6073 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G94B | G94 |
Launch date | 12 October 2009 | 30 March 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $43.99 | $489 |
Place in performance rating | 1421 | 1422 |
Price now | $43.99 | $186.29 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.94 | 4.05 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 550 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 156 gflops | 176 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 64 |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s | 17.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 59 Watt |
Transistor count | 505 million | 505 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 198 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 768 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB / s | 38.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |