NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 47% higher texture fill rate: 17.6 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 90 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 59 Watt vs 134 Watt
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1400 MHz
Launch date | 30 March 2009 vs 5 March 2007 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 90 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 59 Watt vs 134 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 96 vs 64
- Around 31% better floating-point performance: 230.4 gflops vs 176 gflops
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 419 vs 402
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 120 vs 57
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3230 vs 2917
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3230 vs 2917
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 96 vs 64 |
Floating-point performance | 230.4 gflops vs 176 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 419 vs 402 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 120 vs 57 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3230 vs 2917 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3230 vs 2917 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 402 | 419 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 57 | 120 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2917 | 3230 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2917 | 3230 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G94 | G80 |
Launch date | 30 March 2009 | 5 March 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $489 | $1,999 |
Place in performance rating | 1429 | 1242 |
Price now | $186.29 | $143.51 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 4.05 | 5.45 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 176 gflops | 230.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 64 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s | 12 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 59 Watt | 134 Watt |
Transistor count | 505 million | 681 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 198 mm | 229 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 768 MB | 768 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 38.4 GB / s | 67.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |