NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M vs ATI Radeon 9800 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M and ATI Radeon 9800 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 412 MHz
- 3.6x more texture fill rate: 12 GTexel / s vs 3.3 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 90 nm vs 150 nm
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 60 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 64% higher memory clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 730 MHz
- 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 218 vs 57
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 272 vs 160
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 September 2005 vs 1 October 2003 |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 412 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s vs 3.3 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm vs 150 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 60 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 218 vs 57 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 272 vs 160 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9800 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M | ATI Radeon 9800 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 218 | 57 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 272 | 160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1247 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1247 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M | ATI Radeon 9800 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Curie | Rage 9 |
Code name | G71 | R360 |
Launch date | 29 September 2005 | 1 October 2003 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 1052 | 1055 |
Price now | $99.99 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.77 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 500 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 412 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s | 3.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 278 million | 117 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-III | AGP 8x |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x Molex | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 38.4 GB / s | 23.36 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 600 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 730 MHz |
Memory type | 256 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 |