NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M vs ATI Radeon 9100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M and ATI Radeon 9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 250 MHz
- 6x more texture fill rate: 12 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 90 nm vs 150 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 64 MB
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 36.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 218 vs 6
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 272 vs 163
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 September 2005 vs 1 April 2003 |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 250 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 64 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 218 vs 6 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 272 vs 163 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 9100
- Around 61% lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 45 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M | ATI Radeon 9100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 218 | 6 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 272 | 163 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1247 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1247 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M | ATI Radeon 9100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Curie | Rage 7 |
Code name | G71 | R200 |
Launch date | 29 September 2005 | 1 April 2003 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 1054 | 1057 |
Price now | $99.99 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.77 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 500 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 250 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s | 2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 28 Watt |
Transistor count | 278 million | 60 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-III | AGP 4x |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0c | 8.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 1.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 38.4 GB / s | 8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 600 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 500 MHz |
Memory type | 256 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 |