NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GS OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GS OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 530 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 12.72 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s
- Around 6% better floating-point performance: 127.2 gflops vs 120 gflops
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 367 vs 282
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 530 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 12.72 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 127.2 gflops vs 120 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 367 vs 282 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GS OEM
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 768 MB vs 512 MB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1598 MHz
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 41 vs 38
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2389 vs 2376
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2389 vs 2376
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 768 MB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1598 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 41 vs 38 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2389 vs 2376 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2389 vs 2376 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GS OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GS OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 367 | 282 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 38 | 41 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2376 | 2389 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2376 | 2389 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GS OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G94 | G94 |
Launch date | 14 August 2008 | 29 July 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99.95 | |
Place in performance rating | 1521 | 1522 |
Price now | $99.95 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.66 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 530 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 127.2 gflops | 120 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 12.72 GTexel / s | 12 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Transistor count | 505 million | 505 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-HE | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 768 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.1 GB / s | 48.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1598 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
PureVideo HD |