NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 530 MHz
- Around 6% better floating-point performance: 134.4 gflops vs 127.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1048 MB vs 512 MB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1598 MHz
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 424 vs 367
- 4.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 188 vs 38
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 September 2010 vs 14 August 2008 |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 530 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 134.4 gflops vs 127.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1048 MB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1598 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 424 vs 367 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 188 vs 38 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
- 4.5x more texture fill rate: 12.72 GTexel / s vs 2.8 GTexel / s
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2376 vs 1626
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2376 vs 1626
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 12.72 GTexel / s vs 2.8 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2376 vs 1626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2376 vs 1626 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 424 | 367 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 188 | 38 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1163 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.121 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 109.787 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.005 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.55 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 660 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1158 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1626 | 2376 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 660 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1158 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1626 | 2376 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Tesla |
Code name | GF108 | G94 |
Launch date | 3 September 2010 | 14 August 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1518 | 1521 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99.95 | |
Price now | $99.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.66 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 530 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 134.4 gflops | 127.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 2.8 GTexel / s | 12.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 505 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-HE |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1048 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 51.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1598 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
PureVideo HD |