NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 550 MHz
- Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 26.4 GTexel / s
- Around 9% better floating-point performance: 288 gflops vs 264 gflops
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 105 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 384 MB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 415 vs 330
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3259 vs 3128
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3259 vs 3128
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 December 2009 vs 31 January 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 550 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s vs 26.4 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 288 gflops vs 264 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 105 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 384 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 415 vs 330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3259 vs 3128 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3259 vs 3128 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 121 vs 41
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 121 vs 41 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 415 | 330 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 41 | 121 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1963 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1963 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3259 | 3128 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3259 | 3128 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
| Code name | G92 | G92 |
| Launch date | 1 December 2009 | 31 January 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1257 | 1259 |
| Price now | $49.95 | |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 22.55 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 550 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 288 gflops | 264 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 96 |
| Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s | 26.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 105 Watt |
| Transistor count | 754 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 384 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | 38.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| PowerMizer 8.0 | ||

