AMD Radeon HD 6670 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6670 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6670
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 5x more pipelines: 480 vs 96
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 768.0 gflops vs 288 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 66 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 724 vs 415
- 5.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 244 vs 43
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3260 vs 1963
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 vs 3259
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3260 vs 1963
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 vs 3259
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 April 2011 vs 1 December 2009 |
| Pipelines | 480 vs 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 768.0 gflops vs 288 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 66 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 724 vs 415 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 244 vs 43 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3260 vs 1963 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 vs 3259 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3260 vs 1963 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 vs 3259 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
- Around 50% higher texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
- Around 90% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1050 MHz
| Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6670
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 6670 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 724 | 415 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 244 | 43 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1900 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.861 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 235.463 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.463 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.918 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.551 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1564 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3260 | 1963 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3259 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1564 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3260 | 1963 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3259 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 6670 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
| Code name | Turks | G92 |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
| Launch date | 19 April 2011 | 1 December 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1261 | 1262 |
| Price now | $102.99 | $49.95 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.12 | 22.55 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 768.0 gflops | 288 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 480 | 96 |
| Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s | 28.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 66 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 754 million |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 64.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| CUDA | ||
| PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon HD 6670 with others
AMDRadeon HD 6670 vs
ATIRadeon HD 3200
AMDRadeon HD 6670 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 280M
AMDRadeon HD 6670 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 2800M
AMDRadeon HD 6670 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7570
AMDRadeon HD 6670 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7620G IGP
AMDRadeon HD 6670 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2000M
