NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
- 2x more texture fill rate: 3.2 GTexel / s vs 1.6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 16 vs 8
- 2x better floating-point performance: 25.6 gflops vs 12.8 gflops
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 308 vs 190
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 3.2 GTexel / s vs 1.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 16 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 25.6 gflops vs 12.8 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 308 vs 190 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M
- Around 70% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 17 Watt
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 97 vs 87
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 17 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 97 vs 87 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 87 | 97 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 308 | 190 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1027 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1027 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G86 | G86 |
Launch date | 9 May 2007 | 9 May 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 993 | 911 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 400 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 25.6 gflops | 12.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 3.2 GTexel / s | 1.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt | 10 Watt |
Transistor count | 210 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 9.6 GB / s | 11.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3, GDDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 | yes |
Technologies |
||
PowerMizer 7.0 | ||
nView |