NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti500
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 and NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 240 MHz
- 14.6x more texture fill rate: 28 GTexel / s vs 1.92 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 150 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 64 MB
- 3.2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 124x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 372 vs 3
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 January 2008 vs 1 October 2001 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 240 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 28 GTexel / s vs 1.92 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 150 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 64 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 372 vs 3 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti500
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 116 vs 81
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 116 vs 81 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti500
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 | NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 372 | 3 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 81 | 116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3285 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3285 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 | NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Kelvin |
| Code name | G92 | NV20 A5 |
| Launch date | 8 January 2008 | 1 October 2001 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,599 | $349 |
| Place in performance rating | 1330 | 1333 |
| Price now | $99.02 | |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.26 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 240 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 280 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 150 nm |
| Pipelines | 112 | |
| Texture fill rate | 28 GTexel / s | 1.92 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 78 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 754 million | 57 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 4x |
| Length | 267 mm | 183 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 8.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR |
