NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 26% higher texture fill rate: 35.2 GTexel / s vs 28 GTexel / s
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 128 vs 112
- Around 26% better floating-point performance: 352.0 gflops vs 280 gflops
- Around 4% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 78 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 456 vs 378
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3315 vs 3285
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3315 vs 3285
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 August 2008 vs 8 January 2008 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 35.2 GTexel / s vs 28 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 128 vs 112 |
Floating-point performance | 352.0 gflops vs 280 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 78 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 456 vs 378 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3315 vs 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3315 vs 3285 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 91 vs 88
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 91 vs 88 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 456 | 378 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 88 | 91 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3315 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3315 | 3285 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G92 | G92 |
Launch date | 14 August 2008 | 8 January 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $925 | $1,599 |
Place in performance rating | 1305 | 1306 |
Price now | $925 | $99.02 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.12 | 8.26 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 352.0 gflops | 280 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 112 |
Texture fill rate | 35.2 GTexel / s | 28 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 78 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-HE | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PowerMizer 8.0 |