NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 26% higher texture fill rate: 35.2 GTexel / s vs 28 GTexel / s
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 128 vs 112
- Around 26% better floating-point performance: 352.0 gflops vs 280 gflops
- Around 4% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 78 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 452 vs 372
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3315 vs 3285
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3315 vs 3285
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 14 August 2008 vs 8 January 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 35.2 GTexel / s vs 28 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 128 vs 112 |
| Floating-point performance | 352.0 gflops vs 280 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 78 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 452 vs 372 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3315 vs 3285 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3315 vs 3285 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 452 | 372 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 81 | 81 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3315 | 3285 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3315 | 3285 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
| Code name | G92 | G92 |
| Launch date | 14 August 2008 | 8 January 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $925 | $1,599 |
| Place in performance rating | 1328 | 1330 |
| Price now | $925 | $99.02 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.12 | 8.26 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 352.0 gflops | 280 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 128 | 112 |
| Texture fill rate | 35.2 GTexel / s | 28 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 78 Watt |
| Transistor count | 754 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-HE | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M with others
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3700M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 2400
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3700M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3700
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3700M vs
ATIRadeon HD 4870
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3700M vs
NVIDIATesla M2070
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3700M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 615
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3700M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7520G
