NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9800
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 and ATI Mobility Radeon 9800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 72% higher core clock speed: 602 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 13.8x more texture fill rate: 38.5 GTexel / s vs 2.8 GTexel / s
- 24x more pipelines: 192 vs 8
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 130 nm
- 6x more maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 256 MB
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 21.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 986 vs 46
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 November 2008 vs 1 July 2004 |
Core clock speed | 602 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 38.5 GTexel / s vs 2.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 8 |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1536 MB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 986 vs 46 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon 9800
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 110 vs 64
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 110 vs 64 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon 9800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 | ATI Mobility Radeon 9800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 986 | 46 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 64 | 110 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15302 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 | ATI Mobility Radeon 9800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | R400 |
Code name | GT200B | M18 |
Launch date | 11 November 2008 | 1 July 2004 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,799 | |
Place in performance rating | 1312 | 1313 |
Price now | $149.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.67 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 350 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 38.5 GTexel / s | 2.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 160 million |
Boost clock speed | 350 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB / s | 19.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 300 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | 256 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Powerplay |