NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
• Around 9% higher core clock speed: 602 MHz vs 550 MHz
• Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 38.5 GTexel / s vs 35.2 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 192 vs 128
• Around 31% better floating-point performance: 462.3 gflops vs 352.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 1 GB
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 982 vs 456
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3315
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3315

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

• 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 88 vs 73

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	982 456
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	73 88
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3315
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3315

Compare specifications (specs)