NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs ATI Radeon HD 4550
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K1200 and ATI Radeon HD 4550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 76% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 7.5x more texture fill rate: 35.97 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- 6.4x more pipelines: 512 vs 80
- 12x better floating-point performance: 1,151 gflops vs 96 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
- 3.8x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1310 MHz
- 12.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2952 vs 236
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 578 vs 429
- 5.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3288 vs 558
- 5.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3288 vs 558
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 January 2015 vs 30 September 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 35.97 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 80 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,151 gflops vs 96 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1310 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2952 vs 236 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 578 vs 429 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3288 vs 558 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3288 vs 558 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4550
- Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 45 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1200
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4550
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K1200 | ATI Radeon HD 4550 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2952 | 236 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 578 | 429 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8820 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.949 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 466.139 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.629 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.411 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 117.722 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4080 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1721 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3288 | 558 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4080 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1721 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3288 | 558 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K1200 | ATI Radeon HD 4550 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
| Code name | GM107 | RV710 |
| Launch date | 28 January 2015 | 30 September 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $321.97 | $59 |
| Place in performance rating | 798 | 800 |
| Price now | $289.99 | |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.00 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1058 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,151 gflops | 96 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 80 |
| Texture fill rate | 35.97 GTexel / s | 4.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 242 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort, mDP mDP mDP mDP | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 160 mm | 168 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1310 MHz |
| Memory type | 128 Bit | DDR2 |
| Memory bandwidth | 10.48 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
